Difficulties of morphologic diagnosis of congenital melanocytic nevi
https://doi.org/10.24884/1607-4181-2025-32-2-
Abstract
Morphologic diagnostics of melanocytic neoplasms can cause considerable difficulties. There are no absolute criteria to determine the malignancy potential in controversial cases. A clinical and morphologic observation of an intradermal nevus with histologic features of congenital nevus is presented. The features of congenital nevus – involvement of epithelium of skin appendages, growth around appendages and vessels, invagination of nevoid cells in the lumen of lymphatic vessels – are revealed. In differential diagnosis of melanocytic neoplasms of the skin, a morphologist should evaluate not only the presence/absence of signs of atypism and polymorphism of nevomelanocytes, but also signs characteristic of congenital nevi – growth around skin appendages with possible involvement of epithelium, as well as accumulations of nevomelanocytes around vessels with possible presence of nevomelanocytes in the lumen of lymphatic vessels. Expression of HMB-45 and CyclinD1 in few superficial melanocytes, low proliferative activity (as measured by Ki67) along with histologic features allow diagnosing melanocytic nevus with congenital features.
About the Authors
I. A. KuznetsovaRussian Federation
Kuznetsova Irina A., Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Pathological Anatomy with Pathology Unit
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
Competing Interests:
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
S. A. Yaremenko
Russian Federation
Yaremenko Sofiia A., 5th year Student, Faculty of Medicine
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
Competing Interests:
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. V. Kalinina
Russian Federation
Kalinina Alla V., 5th year Student, Faculty of Dentistry
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
Competing Interests:
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Collie C. J., Ho J. D. WHO classification // PathologyOutlines.com website. URL: https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/skintumormelanocyticWHO.html (accessed 19.05.2025).
2. Moustafa D., Blundell A. R., Hawryluk E. B. Congenital melanocytic nevi // Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020;32(4):491–497. http://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000924.
3. Gassenmaier M., Häfner H. M., Hahn M. et al.Histological and Immunohistochemical Changes of Congenital Melanocytic Nevi With Age // Am J Dermatopathol. 2021;43(10):707– 713. http://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000001894.
4. Ricci C., Dika E., Ambrosi F. et al. Cutaneous melanomas: a single center experience on the usage of immunohistochemistry applied for the diagnosis // Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(11):5911. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115911.
5. Wick M. R., Swanson P. E., Rocamora A. Recognition of malignant melanoma by monoclonal antibody HMB-45. An immunohistochemical study of 200 paraffin-embedded cutaneous tumors // Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 1988;15(4):201–7. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0560.1988.tb00544.x. PMID: 3053811.
6. Grillini M., Ricci C., Pino V. et al.HMB45/PRAME, a novel double staining for the diagnosis of melanocytic neoplasms: technical aspects, results, and comparison with other commercially available staining (PRAME and Melan A/PRAME) // Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2022;30:14–18. http://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000972.
7. Camargo C. P., Saliba M., Saad E. A. et al. Treatments of palpebral congenital melanocytic nevus: a systematic review // Acta Cir Bras. 2023;38:e384823. http://doi.org/10.1590/acb384823.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsova I.A., Yaremenko S.A., Kalinina A.V. Difficulties of morphologic diagnosis of congenital melanocytic nevi. The Scientific Notes of the Pavlov University. 2025;32(2):113-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1607-4181-2025-32-2-