Preview

The Scientific Notes of the Pavlov University

Advanced search

Predictive value of ASCA and ANCA in inflammatory bowel diseases

https://doi.org/10.24884/1607-4181-2024-31-1-37-46

Abstract

Introduction. Serological diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is an additional tool not only for differential diagnosis, but also for individual prediction of the clinical course and long-term outcomes of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

The objective was to assess the occurrence and capabilities of determining antibodies to Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA) and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in predicting the clinical outcomes of IBD.

Methods and materials. The study included 71 patients with CD, 26 with UC, and 21 with and 21 with IBD unclassified (IBDU). The comparison group consisted of 35 patients with other gastrointestinal diseases (irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D), celiac disease, autoimmune gastritis (AIG)); the control group consisted of 24 apparently healthy individuals. The level of antibodies to ASCA IgA and IgG was measured by the ELISA method (ORGENTEC Diagnostika GmbH, Germany), ANCA IgG was determined by the IIF method of the Granulocyte Mosaic test system (EUROIMMUN AG, Germany).

Results. The occurrence of ASCA IgA and IgG in patients with CD was 25 % and 38 %, which is significantly higher compared to patients with UC (0 % and 3.8 %), IBDU (5 % and 5 %), AIG (0 % and 5.3 %) respectively (p<0.05). Seropositivity for ANCA IgG in patients with UC was 54 %, which is significantly higher than in patients with CD, IBDU, AIG – 9.9 %, 9.5 % and 5.3 %, respectively (p<0.05). In patients with IBS-D and the control group, ASCA IgA and IgG and ANCA IgG were not detected. The combination of ASCA IgA and/or IgG seropositivity with a negative ANCA IgG result is more sensitive in differentiating CD from UC than the isolated determination of ASCA IgA (39.5 % vs. 25.3 %) with a specificity of 95.8 % and 96.5 %, respectively. The sensitivity of the combined detection of ANCA IgG with negative ASCA IgA and IgG results was comparable to the isolated detection of ANCA IgG – 52.5 % vs. 53.8 %, while the specificity increased to 94.6 %. ASCA IgA/G seropositivity serves as an unfavorable prognostic marker for the onset of CD before the age of 40, the stenotic and penetrating behavior, as well as the need for surgical treatment of the disease. Higher ANCA IgG titers were observed in patients with severe attack of UC (320 [320;640]) compared to mild attack (40 [40;80], p<0.05).

Conclusion. ASCA and ANCA are highly specific markers of CD and UC, the combined determination of which makes it possible to increase the efficiency of serological examination not only in differential diagnosis, but also in personalized prediction of the clinical course of IBD.

About the Authors

D. A. Kuznetsova
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Kuznetsova Daria A., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Physician (Сlinical Laboratory Diagnostics) of the Laboratory for the Diagnostics of Autoimmune Diseases of the Scientific and Methodological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation for Molecular Medicine

6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022


Competing Interests:

 Authors declare no conflict of interest 



S. V. Lapin
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Lapin Sergey V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Laboratory for the Diagnostics of Autoimmune Diseases of the Scientific and Methodological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation for Molecular Medicine

Saint Petersburg


Competing Interests:

 Authors declare no conflict of interest 



O. B. Shchukina
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Shchukina Oksana B., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Chair of Family Medicine, Head of the Municipal Center for Diagnostics and Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Saint Petersburg


Competing Interests:

 Authors declare no conflict of interest 



I. V. Gubonina
Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

Gubonina Irina V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the 2nd Department of Therapy (Postgraduate Training)

Saint Petersburg


Competing Interests:

 Authors declare no conflict of interest 



A. A. Kamanin
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Kamanin Alexey A., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Assistant of the Department of General Surgery with Clinic, Physician (Surgery) of the Surgical Department № 3 of the Research Institute of Surgery and Emergency Medicine

Saint Petersburg


Competing Interests:

 Authors declare no conflict of interest 



References

1. Saeid Seyedian S., Nokhostin F., Dargahi Malamir M. A review of the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment methods of inflammatory bowel disease // Journal of Medicine and Life. 2019;12(2):113–122.

2. Nuij V. J. A. A., Zelinkova Z., Rijk M. C. M. et al. Phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease at diagnosis in the Netherlands // Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2013;19(10):2215–2222.

3. Kovács M. New serological markers in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease // World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014;20(17):4873.

4. Kuznetsova D. А., Lapin S. V., Shchukina O. B. The diagnostic and prognostic value of serological markers of inflammatory bowel diseases (a literature review) // Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2020;48(6):364–374. (In Russ.).

5. McGonagle D., McDermott M. F. A proposed classification of the immunological diseases // PLoS Medicine. 2006;3(8):e297.

6. Padoan A., Musso G., Contran N., Basso D. Inflammation, autoinflammation and autoimmunity in inflammatory bowel diseases // Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2023;45(7):5534–5557.

7. Aleksandrova E.N., Novikov A.A., Lukina G V., et al. Clinical value of antibodies in inflammatory bowel diseases // Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2021;93(2):228–235. (In Russ.).

8. Tesija Kuna A. Serological markers of inflammatory bowel disease // Biochemia Medica. 2013:28–42.

9. Wang Z.-Z., Shi K., Peng J. Serologic testing of a panel of five antibodies in inflammatory bowel diseases: Diagnostic value and correlation with disease phenotype // Biomedical Reports. 2017;6(4):401–410.

10. Schulte-Pelkum J., Radice A., Norman G. L. et al. Novel clinical and diagnostic aspects of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies // Journal of Immunology Research. 2014;2014:1–12.

11. Lee W.-I., Subramaniam K., Hawkins C. A. et al. The significance of ANCA positivity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease // Pathology. 2019;51(6):634–639.

12. Yorulmaz E., Adalı G., Yorulmaz H. et al. The correlation between new serological markers and disease phenotype and activation in inflammatory bowel disease // Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases. 2022;14(3):294–303.

13. Main J., McKenzie H., Yeaman G. R. et al. Antibody to Saccharomyces cerevisiae (bakers’ yeast) in Crohn’s disease // BMJ. 1988;297(6656):1105–1106.

14. Saxon A., Shanahan F., Landers C. et al. A distinct subset of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies is associated with inflammatory bowel disease // Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 1990;86(2):202–210.

15. Rump J.A., Schölmerich J., Gross V., et al. A new type of Perinuclear Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (p-ANCA) in active ulcerative colitis but not in Crohn’s Disease // Immunobiology. 1990;181(4–5):406–413.

16. Shor D. B., Orbach H., Boaz M. et al. Gastrointestinal-associated autoantibodies in different autoimmune diseases // American journal of clinical and experimental immunology. 2012;1(1):49–55.

17. Mitsuyama K. Antibody markers in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease // World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2016;22(3):1304.

18. Saibeni S., Folli C., de Franchis R. et al. Diagnostic role and clinical correlates of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (p-ANCA) in Italian patients with inflammatory bowel diseases // Digestive and Liver Disease. 2003;35(12):862–868.

19. Forcione D. G. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA) positivity is associated with increased risk for early surgery in Crohn’s disease // Gut. 2004;53(8):1117– 1122.

20. Damoiseaux J. G. M. C., Bouten B., Linders A. M. L. W. et al. Diagnostic value of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies for inflammatory bowel disease: high prevalence in patients with celiac disease // Journal of Clinical Immunology. 2002;22(5):281–288.

21. Kotze L. M. da S., Nisihara R. M., Utiyama S. R. da R. et al. Antibodies anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA) do not differentiate Crohn’s disease from celiac disease // Arquivos de Gastroenterologia. 2010;47(3):242–245.

22. Kaul A., Hutfless S., Liu L., et al. Serum anti-glycan antibody biomarkers for inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis and progression: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2012;18(10):1872–1884.

23. Papp M., Altorjay I., Dotan N. et al. New serological markers for inflammatory bowel disease are associated with earlier age at onset, complicated disease behavior, risk for surgery, and NOD2/CARD15 genotype in a Hungarian IBD cohort // The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008;103(3):665–681.

24. Zhang Z., Li C., Zhao X. et al. Anti-saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies associate with phenotypes and higher risk for surgery in Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis // Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2012;57(11):2944–2954.

25. Shchukina O. B. Differential diagnostic and prognostic clinical forms of Crohn’s disease: extended abstract of PhD dissertation. SPb: Admiral (Russia), 2017, 37 p. (In Russ.).

26. Prideaux L., De Cruz P., Ng S. C. et al. Serological antibodies in inflammatory bowel dis-ease: a systematic review // Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2012;18(7):1340–1355.

27. Kharitonov A. G., Kondrashina E. A., Baranovsky A. Y. et al. Antibodies to the cytoplasm of neutrophils: a marker of unfavorable clinical course in non-specific ulcerative colitis // Medical Immunology (Russia). 2014;12(6):537. (In Russ.).

28. Papp M. Utility of serological markers in inflammatory bowel diseases: Gadget or magic? // World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2007;13(14):2028.

29. Vasiliauskas E., Plevy S., Landers C. et al. Perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in patients with Crohn’s disease define a clinical subgroup // Gastroenterology. 1996;110(6):1810–1819.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Kuznetsova D.A., Lapin S.V., Shchukina O.B., Gubonina I.V., Kamanin A.A. Predictive value of ASCA and ANCA in inflammatory bowel diseases. The Scientific Notes of the Pavlov University. 2024;31(1):37-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1607-4181-2024-31-1-37-46

Views: 130


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1607-4181 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8807 (Online)