PREVENTION OF PURULENT CHOLANGITIS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS ENDOBILIARY TRANSPAPILLARY DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE

Introduction. The incidence of cholangitis varied from 9 % to 33 % after the insertion of transpapillary external-internal endobiliary drainage. In case of proximal bile obstruction, the method of suprapapillary insertion of external-internal drainage were widely used for prevention of purulent complications. But it was impossible to use this method in case of distal bile obstruction. The choice of initial decompression method for distal bile duct obstruction (external only or transpapillary external-internal drainage) was unclear.

The objective was to improve results of primary percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with jaundice and distal bile duct obstruction.

Material and methods. As a primary decompression method, percutaneous transhepatic endobiliary interventions under ultrasound and X-ray control were performed in 81 patients with distal bile duct obstruction. External-internal transpapillary drainage were performed in 30 patients, only external drainage – in 21 patients and in 31 patients we used original combined technique (compilation of external and external-internal transpapillary drainage).

Results. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications were noticed in 23 patient (28 %). Complications in the group of external endobiliary drainage were observed in 4 (19 %) patients. In the group of external-internal drainage, complication rate was 53.3 % (16 patients). At the same time, purulent complications were noted in 30 % of cases (9 people). In case of using combined external-internal drainage, no purulent complications was diagnosed. In the treatment of all complications, minimally invasive methods were successfully used.

Conclusion. Our results showed advantages of the original combined technique due to the absence of the risk of purulent complications, and ensuring transpapillary access at the same time.

1. Gal’perin Je. I., Kotovskij A. E. Temp dekompressii zhelchnyh protokov pri mehanicheskoj zheltuhe opuholevoj jetiologii. Khirurgija. 2011;(8):33–42. (In Russ.).

2. Karimov Sh. I., Hakimov M. Sh., Adylhadzhaev F. F, Rahmanov S. U., Hasanov V. R. Lechenie oslozhnenij chreskozhnyh chrespechenochnyh jendobiliarnyh vmeshatel’stv pri mehanicheskoj zheltuhe, obuslovlennoj periampuljarnymi opuholjami. Annaly khirurgicheskoj gepatologii. 2015;(3):68–74. (In Russ.).

3. Kubachev K. G., Borisov A. E., Izudinov A. S. Vybor sposoba drenirovaniya zhelchnykh protokov pri mekhanicheskoy zheltukhe opukholevogo geneza. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2009;14(3):56–62. (In Russ.).

4. Kulezneva Yu. V., Izrailov R. E., Kapustin V. I. Taktika antegradnoy biliarnoy dekompressii pri mekhanicheskoy zheltukhe opukholevogo geneza. Vestnik Natsional’nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo tsentra im. N. I. Pirogova. 2010;5(2):24–28. (In Russ.).

5. Lukichev O. D., Ivshin V. G., Makarov Ju. I. i dr. Sravnitel’nyj analiz razlichnyh metodik chreskozhnogo chrespechenochnogo zhelcheotvedenija u bol’nyh s mehanicheskoj zheltuhoj opuholevoj jetiologii. Vestnik RONC im. N. N. Blohina RAMN. 2004;15(1–2):121–125. (In Russ.).

6. Rybachkov V. V., Dryazhenkov T. G., Kabanov E. N. Prichiny endogennoy intoksikatsii pri gnoynom kholangite. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2009;14(2):28–32. (In Russ.).

7. Shevchenko Yu. L., Vetshev P. S., Stoyko Yu. M., Levchuk A. L. Diagnostika i khirurgicheskaya taktika pri sindrome mekhanicheskoy zheltukhi. Vestnik Natsional’nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo tsentra im. N. I. Pirogova. 2008;13(4):96–105. (In Russ.).

8. Fang Y., Gurusamy K. S., Wang Q. et al. Preoperative biliary drainage fore obstructive jaundice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(12):9.

9. Rosch T., Trihtard A., Chigogize N. et al. Bacteriobilia in percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage occurrence over time and clinical sequeial. A prospective observational study. Scanal J Gastroenterol. 2003;38(11):1162–1168.

10. Kucukav F., Okten R. S., Cumhur T. Percutaneous biliary intervention for primary sclerosing cholangitis in a patient with situs inversus totalis. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011;22(6):636–640.

11. Brody L. A., Brown K. T., Getrajdman G. I. et al. Cli nical factors associated with positive bile cultures during primary percutaneous biliary drainage. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 1998;9(4):572–578.

12. Salmiuen P., Laine S., Gullichsen R. Severe and fatal complicaitions after ERCP: analysis of 2555 procedures in a single experienced center. Surg Endoscopy. 2008;22(9):1965–1970.

13. Uberoi R., Bas N., Moss J., Robertson I. British society of interventional radiolodgy: Billiary drainage and stenting resistry (BDCR). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;(35):127–138.

14. Winikc A. B., Waybill P. N., Venbrux A. C. Complicaitions of transhepatic biliary interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;(4):200–206.

15. Shin Abn, Yoon-Seon Lee, Lion R. S., Lee S. L. Ma lignant biliary obstruction: can we predict immediate postprosedural cholangitis after percutaneous biliary drainage? Surgeon Care Cancel. 2013;(21):2321–2326.

16. Kulezneva Yu. V., Bruslik S. V., Musaev G. H., Izrailov R. E., Kirillova M. S. Antegradnye metody dekom pressii zhelchnyh protokov: evolyuciya i spornye voprosy. Annaly khirurgicheskoj gepatologii. 2011;16(3):35–41. (In Russ.).

17. Borisova N. A., Borisov A. E., Kareev A. V. Endobiliarnye metody korrekcii mekhanicheskoj zheltuhi: Rukovodstvo po hirurgii pecheni i zhelchevyvodyashchih putej. T. 2. Pod red. Borisova A. E. SPb., Skifiya, 2003:254–281. (In Russ.).